Was Anna Anderson the Last Remaining Romanov?

Anna Anderson Manahan was one of the most famous imposters of the Grand Duchess Anastasia of Russia. Anastasia was a daughter of Tsar Nicholas II – the last Emperor (or Tsar) of Russia. Tsar Nicholas II and his family (the Romanov family) were executed in 1918 and their bodies were secretly buried at an unknown location. However, there was always speculation that not all the family members were killed. Since 1918, over 200 people have claimed to be a member of the Romanov family, and each insisted that they had escaped the execution and fled from Russia. The most famous imposter was a Polish peasant, known as Anna Anderson.

In 1991, nine human skeletons were discovered in a shallow grave near Ekaterinburg, Russia. DNA analyses of these remains confirmed that five of the skeletons are members of the Romanov family, and the remaining four are assumed to be the family doctor and three servants. Two Romanov skeletons were not found in this grave – Alexei and one of the daughters – so there was still speculation that they had managed to escape the execution. However, initial DNA analyses confirmed that Anna Anderson was not one of the Romanovs. In 2007, the remains of the last two members of the Romanov family were discovered, and their identities were confirmed by DNA analyses. So now that all members of this famous family have been accounted for, who really was Anna Anderson?

Is Anna Anderson actually Franzisca Schanzkowska?

In the 1920s, the Grand Duke of Hesse (uncle of the Romanov children) hired a private detective in a bid to verify the identity of Anna Anderson. This detective proposed that Anna Anderson was actually Franzisca Schanzkowska, and not, as she claimed to be, Anastasia Romanov. Franzisca was born around 1896 in the north of Germany, near the Polish border. During World War I, she was badly injured and was later admitted to two different mental hospitals, until she disappeared in 1920. Franzisca’s disappearance coincided with the time that Anna Anderson first claimed that she was the missing Anastasia Romanov. In the 1920s, there was no way to confirm the hypothesis that Anna Anderson and Franzisca were the same person. However, modern genetic analysis techniques now provide that opportunity.

What DNA analyses were undertaken to identify Anna Anderson?

If Anna Anderson were truly Franzisca Schanzkowska, she would share the same mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) profile as maternal relatives of Franzisca. This is because mtDNA is passed down from mother to child along the direct maternal lineage, so that all individuals who have descended from the same maternal lineage are expected to have exactly the same or very similar mtDNA profiles. A maternal relative of Franzisca’s was identified and he agreed to provide a blood sample for DNA comparisons. This relative, Carl Maucher, is a great nephew of Franzisca’s, through the maternal line. The mtDNA profile of Anna Anderson’s was determined from a tissue sample collected during surgery in 1979. This mtDNA profile was a match to the mtDNA profile obtained from Carl Maucher, indicating that they share a common maternal ancestor.


The original genetic analyses from Anna Anderson were enough to confirm that she was not Anastasia Romanov (or any of the Romanov daughters). These subsequent analyses have now provided strong evidence that Franzisca Schanzkowska and Anna Anderson were the same person. We may never know the reasons Schanzkowska claimed to be a Romanov, but it is possible that her mental illness actually led her to believe that she truly was a Grand Duchess.

DNA Database Comparisons

The DNA tests conducted in this study have defined the mtDNA profile of Anna Anderson – one of the world’s most famous imposters. If you have taken the mtDNA HVR1 (Standard Maternal Ancestry) test, you can compare your mtDNA against this imposter to see if you may have descended from the same maternal lineage.

Mourning the Romanovs

It’s been 100 years since the Bolsheviks executed Tsar Nicholas II and his entire family. Will the Russian Orthodox Church finally recognize their remains, and bury them with full rites? The Romanovs The House of Romanov...

King Richard III – Innocent until proven guilty

Why new DNA evidence won’t prove King Richard III was guilty of murdering the ‘Princes in the Tower.’ Richard III became king under very controversial circumstances. He betrayed his brother’s trust by declaring King Edward...

Finding “Nessie” With DNA

Will scientists find a “biological explanation” for the Loch Ness Monster by looking at DNA samples from the Scottish loch?  The Loch Ness Monster or “Nessie” first came into the spotlight when a photo surfaced...

Latest Posts

Alzheimer’s disease risk can be moderated, a new study finds

Researchers identify 21 modifiable risk factors for reducing the risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease. The APOE gene is one of the most-significant genetic risk...

Save $30 on the COVID-19 susceptibility DNA test from Genovate

New COVID-19 cases continue to emerge worldwide, making it clear that this pandemic is far from over. Genovate is here to give you easy...

Study finds a link between the severity of COVID-19 infections and blood type

Researchers link genetic changes in the region of DNA that define blood type with susceptibility to COVID-19 infections. Blood type O offers a protective...

ACE2: Genetic clues to COVID-19 infections and treatment

Scientists identify a possible link between genetic variations in the ACE-2 receptor used by coronaviruses to enter cells and susceptibility to COVID-19 infections. Could...

Would a DNA vaccine be able to stand ground against COVID-19?

With so many countries under lockdown, researchers from around the world are racing against time to develop a vaccine for COVID-19. Keeping with our...